Bat Detector
Schematic
The
circuit has three
stages. A preamplifier to boost the signal
from the microphone, a divider to down convert the frequency of the
Bat to something we can hear and a power amplifier to drive the
loudspeaker. The preamp is based on a standard dual opamp and although
various types will work, I found the TL072
to be the 'liveliest'. It
has two stages, each configured as an
inverting amplifier. The first stage is set to a gain of 22 and the
second is set to 68. Multiplying these two figures together gives an
overall gain of 1496. Experimentation revealed that the circuit was
more stable with less gain on the first stage and more gain on the
second.
Having too high an overall gain causes the circuit to break into
oscillation and so the final figure chosen was a balance between
stability and sensitivity. The output from the
preamp is fed directly into the clock input
of a CD4024 divider IC. This IC has outputs at
differing
division ratios but the one used here is divide by 16,
which gives the perfect detection frequency bandwidth. For example, a
40 kHz signal at the microphone divided by 16 would become 2.5 kHz with
80 kHz becoming 5 kHz, both well within our hearing range. In fact,
much higher frequencies could be detected but the limiting factor is
the microphone. Microphones are generally used for audio and as such
their spec sheets usually only show the frequency response up to about
20 kHz, though in practice, some mics will go much higher and
can be useable at ultrasonic frequencies. Of course the output will be
much lower, but the preamp should be able to compensate for this
Veroboard layout
When
designing something
like this you have to forget everything you know about Hi-Fi principles
as they don't apply here. I wouldn't want to look at any of
the waveforms in this circuit with an oscilloscope as I would probably
be horrified. The
thought of feeding an analogue signal directly into a logic chip is
bizarre, but as the signal contains high and low levels it actually
triggers the input quite nicely! Because the output level of a logic IC
has a constant
amplitude,
what you hear will not be a perfect representation of the sound a Bat
makes (more complex heterodyne detectors are available that convert
amplitude as well, and are also tunable to distinguish between species)
but overall the results are pretty good. As
there is plenty of level from the divider IC, rather than using a full
blown
audio amplifier I just fed the output into two transistors in push pull
configuration. In fact, I had to add a volume control as it can go
quite
loud when driving an 8 ohm speaker, which incidentally remains
completely silent until a Bat is detected. Because the CD4024 draws
very
little current and the transistor output stage is biased as class B,
the overall quiescent current is mainly just that of the opamp (less
than 4mA at 9V). I just managed to squeeze it all onto a 9 x 25
hole veroboard so I've shown the cuts and
links below in more clarity as it's quite densely packed. Note
on the main layout above that some of the pins on the CD4024 DIL socket
are shown as White dots instead of Black dots to indicate they've been
snipped off and removed
Track cuts and
links looking at underside (cuts underneath, links on top)
It doesn't matter how
good the electronics is if the microphone used doesn't respond to
ultrasonic frequencies, so selecting a suitable microphone is very
important if the detector is to work properly. First I
tried a dedicated ultrasonic transducer like the type used in old
fashioned TV remote controls, but didn't have much success. Maybe it
was a dud! I also tried a couple of electrets... the Panasonic WM-61A which although now
discontinued, is still available from a few eBay sellers at a
reasonable price (beware of fakes though!) and the Primo
EM258
which is in production, inexpensive and suggested as an
equivalent to the Panasonic. Although these worked, they just didn't
have the range or sensitivity of my final choice which was a MEMS type
microphone (Micro-Electro-Mechanical System). These relatively new
devices use micro sensors fabricated
from silicon and can work well up into the
ultrasonic region. The one chosen for this project is the Knowles
SPU0410LR5H-QB
which
although being about twice the price of the electret inserts, is still
not overly expensive and given the boost in performance is well worth it. All these mics
require a voltage supply to work as they have an integral preamp
stage. This voltage varies depending on the device but is normally
around 2
to 3 volts. With an electret microphone you can usually get away with
just a feed resistor from the main power rail, but a MEMS microphone
shouldn't exceed it's maximum rating. A perfect solution to power the
Knowles is to utilize the 2.5 volts
developed across a blue LED as I'm doing here. A nice bonus from this
is
that it can also double up as a power indicator by drilling a hole in
the
case for it to shine through. The Knowles mic was
purchased from
micbooster.com (FEL Communications LTD.) who can supply it
pre-mounted
on a small PCB (believe me this makes life
so much easier!). This PCB
has the three connection points... supply plus (+), supply minus (-)
and mic output and there's a handy mounting hole as well.
If you want to try an electret
mic, then just remove the LED and add another 4K7 resistor from the pad
of the LED anode to the mic input. If you don't have a 'Test Bat'
available, a good way to check if the circuit is working is
to jangle a bunch of keys in front of the mic. This will produce a
squeaky, clicky, raspy sound (well that's the best I can
describe it anyway) but an actual Bat will sound much more easy on the
ears! Other test sounds are the letters 'S' and 'F' (by coincidence my
initials)
Wiring diagram showing
the interconnections
LINKS: micbooster.com for Knowles SPU0410LR5H-QB and Primo EM258 micronic.co.uk for Panasonic WM-61A rapidonline.com for Hammond 1593YBK |